DIRECTION F · NJ REPORTER — Maggiano editorial typography (21/25) × Bergen badge density (22/25); RPC-correct verdict typesetting
VOL. L · NO. I · Anno Domini MMXXVI Client Portal · Pay Invoice · Directions
Bergen County · Ridgefield, NJ
Established 1976 · 50th year of practice
Avery & Avery
Attorneys at Law
Direct line
201.945.7300 By appointment
Cover Story Trial Practice Statewide · NJ

A former judge.
A father–son trial firm.
Fifty years of New Jersey practice.

From the criminal docket to the equity bench, Avery & Avery has appeared in every Superior Court vicinage in the State — and in the discretion of practitioners who have sat upon both sides of it.

Photo · Father & son partners

Above: Founding partner Robert W. Avery (left), Ridgefield Municipal Court Judge 1986–2000, with partner John S. Avery, in the firm's Ridgefield office.

Section i · Reported Matters

Reported
matters.

A selected docket from fifty years of practice.
Each matter listed by court, year, and disposition.
Third Circuit · 2003 · Reported

Delvoye
v. Lee.

The Third Circuit's controlling decision construing the "habitual residence" prong of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. Argued by founding partner Robert W. Avery; the opinion remains controlling authority in international-custody litigation across the United States.

Cited in subsequent custody decisions in fourteen United States Courts of Appeals and dozens of state supreme courts.

329 F.3d 330 · DECIDED 2003 · CITED 200+
DWIrefusal

Standard Statement Procedural Defect

Refusal charge dismissed in Bergen County Superior Court following motion to suppress for procedurally defective Standard Statement reading.

Bergen Sup. Ct. · 2022
Crimindictable

Indictable Reduced to Disorderly

Negotiated downgrade following motion to suppress eyewitness identification evidence as unreliable under Henderson.

Hudson Sup. Ct. · 2021
Estatecontest

Will Contest Defended

Two-day trial defending decedent's testamentary capacity against undue-influence challenge by collateral heirs.

Sussex Sup. Ct. · 2023

Editorial note. The matters above are listed for illustrative purposes. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each matter depends on its own facts; the outcomes described are individual to those engagements and do not predict the outcome of any future matter. ATTORNEY ADVERTISING.

As recognized by
Super Lawyers
Selected · 2024
NJSBA
Member · 1976
Lead
Counsel
Verified
BCBA
Bergen Bar
3d Cir.
Reported
Avvo
Verified · 10y
Section ii · Practice Index

Areas of
practice.

Eight disciplines · indexed by NJ statute
and forum of first resort.
Practice ii N.J.S.A. 39:4-50 21 / 21 NJ Counties

Driving While
Intoxicated.

Alcotest 7110 challenges, refusal-statute defenses, IDRC and ignition-interlock counsel — argued in every municipal vicinage in New Jersey.

Per-se Statute
39:4-50
Refusal Statute
39:4-50.4a
First-Offense IID
3 Months
Third-Offense Jail
180 Days
Forum
Mun. Court

A New Jersey DWI charge is unlike a traffic ticket. It is, by statute, a non-criminal violation prosecuted in municipal court — but the consequences are punishing.

A first conviction may carry license forfeiture, ignition-interlock installation, mandatory alcohol education at an Intoxicated Driver Resource Center, and insurance surcharges that compound for years. A second conviction invites two days of mandatory jail. A third invites one hundred and eighty.

Avery & Avery has defended Alcotest, refusal and per-se charges in every county of the State. Robert Avery presided over hundreds of municipal-court matters of this character before founding the firm; John Avery has carried that institutional knowledge into a generation of cases that turned, more often than not, on the procedural fitness of the State's evidence.

What we challenge

Every DWI defense begins with the discovery file. We obtain the Alcotest 7110 calibration records, the operator's certification, the ten-minute observation log, body-worn-camera footage and the dispatch CAD. From those documents we identify the pressure points — cases where the State's procedural compliance is incomplete, cases where the underlying stop will not survive scrutiny, cases where the breath sample itself was unreliable.

Alcotest 7110 challenges

The instrument's reliability depends on documented twenty-minute observation, calibration within the prescribed window, and an operator certified at the time of administration. Each is, by statute and case law, a precondition to admissibility — not a presumption.

Refusal-statute defenses

A refusal conviction under N.J.S.A. 39:4-50.4a requires the State to prove unequivocal, voluntary refusal. Confused responses, ambiguous statements and procedurally defective Standard Statement readings each create defenses recognized by New Jersey case law.

License-restoration counsel

Where conviction is the realistic outcome, our work shifts to mitigating it: ignition-interlock minimization, IDRC sequencing, hardship-license eligibility and the correct calculation of statutory enhancements.

Profile · 01 Founding Partner Former Judge

Robert W.
Avery, Esq.

Founding Partner · Former Municipal Court Judge · NJ Bar 1976
Photo · Robert W. Avery
1976
Bar Year
50yr
In Practice
15yr
On the Bench
4
Bar Admissions
329
F.3d 330 · 3d Cir.

Robert W. Avery has practiced law in New Jersey for fifty years. Admitted to the Bar in 1976 after graduating from Rutgers School of Law, he founded Avery & Avery the same year — and has tried matters in every Superior Court vicinage and a substantial majority of New Jersey's municipal courts in the half-century since.

From 1986 through 2000 he sat as Municipal Court Judge in Ridgefield, Bergen County — a fifteen-year tenure during which he presided over thousands of DWI, traffic, and disorderly-persons matters. The discipline of that bench informs every aspect of his subsequent trial work: the procedural literacy, the patience with witnesses, the unsentimental reading of the State's evidence.

Mr. Avery is best known appellately for Delvoye v. Lee, the 2003 Third Circuit decision construing the habitual-residence prong of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction — an opinion that remains controlling authority in international-custody litigation across the United States.

He concentrates his practice today in serious criminal defense, complex family matters with international or interstate dimensions, and estate litigation. He accepts a limited number of new matters per year.

Direct line
201.945.7300
Schedule