This site contains attorney advertising under the New Jersey Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC) 7.1 through 7.5. The disclosures below are required by RPC 7.2(c) (“Identification of Lawyer Responsible for Advertisement”) and provide the broader RPC 7.1 truthfulness frame.
1. Firm and Responsible Attorney
Avery & Avery, Esqs. 559 Bergen Boulevard 2nd Floor Ridgefield, NJ 07657 (201) 943-2445
The attorney responsible for the content of this advertisement, per RPC 7.2(c), is:
Robert W. Avery, Esq. 559 Bergen Boulevard 2nd Floor Ridgefield, NJ 07657
2. Jurisdictional Scope
Avery & Avery is licensed to practice law in the State of New Jersey. The firm’s active state-court practice spans Bergen, Hudson, Essex, Passaic, Morris, and Sussex counties. The firm also handles federal matters in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, and certiorari practice in the United States Supreme Court.
The firm does not claim admission in any state other than New Jersey.
3. Prior Results Disclaimer
Case results, attorney biographies, settlements, verdicts, and historical practice descriptions appearing on this site, in advertising, or in any firm communication do not guarantee a similar outcome in any future matter. Every legal matter is unique. Outcomes depend on the specific facts, the applicable law, judicial discretion, opposing counsel, and factors outside the firm’s control.
4. Testimonials and Endorsements
Where the site presents testimonials or endorsements, those statements reflect the experience of the named individual(s) and are not a guarantee of similar outcome in any other matter. Per RPC 7.1(a)(3), no testimonial implies that any past favorable result will be duplicated.
5. RPC 7.4 Specialization
Per NJ RPC 7.4, no attorney at the firm holds a New Jersey Supreme Court certification as a “specialist” in any practice area unless that certification is explicitly stated on the attorney’s bio page with the issuing authority and date. Where the firm describes attorneys as “experienced,” “skilled,” “leading,” “premier,” or similar in practice-area context, those terms describe the firm’s view of the attorneys’ practice depth, not certified specialization.
6. RPC 7.3 Solicitation
The firm does not engage in in-person, real-time electronic, or telephone solicitation of prospective clients with whom the firm has no prior professional or family relationship in violation of RPC 7.3. Inquiries to the firm — by web form, phone, or email — are client-initiated.
7. Confidentiality of Prospective-Client Communications
Information shared with the firm at consultation — including by phone, web form, or in person — is protected by RPC 1.18 (Duties to Prospective Clients), even if the firm does not ultimately represent you. The firm will not represent any opposing party in the same matter.
8. Languages
The firm conducts consultations in English. For prospective clients who require interpretation, please mention this on your initial call; we will arrange interpretation where the matter and resources permit.
9. Fee Information
The first consultation is free. Fee structures vary by matter type and are quoted in writing at engagement. See Fees for the firm’s standard fee structures by practice area, and NJ Court Rule R. 1:21-7 for the maximum contingency-fee schedule that governs the firm’s personal-injury work.
10. Reporting Concerns
If you have concerns about an attorney’s compliance with the NJ Rules of Professional Conduct, you may contact:
Office of Attorney Ethics NJ Supreme Court — Office of Attorney Ethics P.O. Box 963 Trenton, NJ 08625-0963 njcourts.gov/courts/supreme/ethics
Updates
This notice is reviewed periodically. The effective date and any substantive update are reflected in the site’s footer.
See also: Privacy Policy, Terms of Use, Contact.